Physics:Quantum instrument: Difference between revisions
Restore Quantum article header template |
WikiHarold (talk | contribs) Restore missing Quantum reference definitions |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | <div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | ||
A quantum instrument is a Book I topic in the Quantum Collection. It is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement that records both the probability of each classical outcome and the corresponding change in the quantum state. Unlike a simple observable, an instrument keeps track of measurement back-action, state update, and conditional dynamics. Quantum instruments are used in open systems, generalized measurements, quantum operations, feedback, tomography, and information theory. They make precise the idea that measurement is a physical process, not only a readout. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width:300px;"> | <div style="width:300px;"> | ||
[[File:Quantum_instrument_concept_map.svg|thumb|280px|instrument in the Quantum Collection.]] | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 22: | ||
Let <math> | Let <math> | ||
X | X | ||
</math> be a | </math> be a countable set describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let <math> | ||
\{\mathcal{E}_x \}_{x\in X} | \{\mathcal{E}_x \}_{x\in X} | ||
</math> denote a collection of trace-non-increasing | </math> denote a collection of trace-non-increasing completely positive maps, such that the sum of all <math> | ||
\mathcal{E}_x | \mathcal{E}_x | ||
</math> is trace-preserving, i.e. <math display="inline"> | </math> is trace-preserving, i.e. <math display="inline"> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 63: | ||
</math> is given by a quantum channel <math> | </math> is given by a quantum channel <math> | ||
\mathcal{I}:\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_1) \rightarrow \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_2)\otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{|X|}) | \mathcal{I}:\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_1) \rightarrow \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_2)\otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{|X|}) | ||
</math> with<ref name=Jordan2024></ref> | </math> with<ref name=Jordan2024>{{cite book| first1=Andrew N. | last1=Jordan | first2=Irfan A. | last2=Siddiqi | title=Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2024 | isbn= 978-1009100069}} | ||
</ref> | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
| Line 82: | Line 80: | ||
== Reductions and inductions == | == Reductions and inductions == | ||
Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> In [[Biography:John A. Smolin|John Smolin]]'s terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger | Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> In [[Biography:John A. Smolin|John Smolin]]'s terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger Hilbert space". | ||
=== As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary === | === As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary === | ||
| Line 90: | Line 88: | ||
defines a quantum instrument.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> can be obtained with this construction for some choice of <math>\eta</math> and <math>\{U_i\}</math>.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> | defines a quantum instrument.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> can be obtained with this construction for some choice of <math>\eta</math> and <math>\{U_i\}</math>.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> | ||
In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the '' | In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the ''reduction'' of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary. | ||
=== Reduction to CPTP map === | === Reduction to CPTP map === | ||
| Line 100: | Line 98: | ||
=== Reduction to POVM === | === Reduction to POVM === | ||
Any quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement ( | Any quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement (POVM): | ||
:<math>M_i := \sum_a K_a^{(i)\dagger} K_a^{(i)}</math> | :<math>M_i := \sum_a K_a^{(i)\dagger} K_a^{(i)}</math> | ||
where <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are any choice of Kraus operators for <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>,<ref name=Busch2016></ref> | where <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are any choice of Kraus operators for <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>,<ref name=Busch2016></ref> | ||
| Line 106: | Line 104: | ||
The Kraus operators <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are not uniquely determined by the CP maps <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>, but the above definition of the POVM elements <math>M_i</math> is the same for any choice.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away. | The Kraus operators <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are not uniquely determined by the CP maps <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>, but the above definition of the POVM elements <math>M_i</math> is the same for any choice.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away. | ||
= References = | |||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:31, 24 May 2026
A quantum instrument is a Book I topic in the Quantum Collection. It is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement that records both the probability of each classical outcome and the corresponding change in the quantum state. Unlike a simple observable, an instrument keeps track of measurement back-action, state update, and conditional dynamics. Quantum instruments are used in open systems, generalized measurements, quantum operations, feedback, tomography, and information theory. They make precise the idea that measurement is a physical process, not only a readout.
Definition
Let be a countable set describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let denote a collection of trace-non-increasing completely positive maps, such that the sum of all is trace-preserving, i.e. for all positive operators
Now for describing a measurement by an instrument , the maps are used to model the mapping from an input state to the output state of a measurement conditioned on a classical measurement outcome . Therefore, the probability that a specific measurement outcome occurs on a state is given by[1][2]
The state after a measurement with the specific outcome is given by[1][2]
If the measurement outcomes are recorded in a classical register, whose states are modeled by a set of orthonormal projections , then the action of an instrument is given by a quantum channel with[3]
Here and are the Hilbert spaces corresponding to the input and the output systems of the instrument.
Reductions and inductions
Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.[2] In John Smolin's terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger Hilbert space".
As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary
Any quantum instrument on a system can be modeled as a projective measurement on and (jointly) an uncorrelated auxiliary followed by a unitary conditional on the measurement outcome.[1][2] Let (with and ) be the normalized initial state of , let (with and ) be a projective measurement on , and let (with ) be unitaries on . Then one can check that
defines a quantum instrument.[2] Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument can be obtained with this construction for some choice of and .[2]
In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the reduction of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary.
Reduction to CPTP map
Any quantum instrument immediately induces a CPTP map, i.e., a quantum channel:[2]
This can be thought of as the overall effect of the measurement on the quantum system if the measurement outcome is thrown away.
Reduction to POVM
Any quantum instrument immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement (POVM):
where are any choice of Kraus operators for ,[2]
The Kraus operators are not uniquely determined by the CP maps , but the above definition of the POVM elements is the same for any choice.[2] The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ozawa, Masanao (1984). "Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables". Journal of Mathematical Physics 25: 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.526000.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka; Pellonpää, Juha-Pekka; Ylinen, Kari (2016). Quantum measurement. 23. Springer. pp. 261--262. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43389-9. ISBN 978-3-319-43387-5.
- ↑ Jordan, Andrew N.; Siddiqi, Irfan A. (2024). Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1009100069.
Source attribution: Quantum instrument
