Physics:Quantum data analysis/Scatter Plots: Difference between revisions
imported>WikiHarold Add Book IV data analysis illustration |
No edit summary |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Scatter Plots in particle-physics data analysis}} | {{Short description|Scatter Plots in particle-physics data analysis}} | ||
{{Quantum data backlink|General Statistical Methods and Data Visualisation}} | |||
{{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum data analysis/Histograms|previous label=Histograms|next=Physics:Quantum data analysis/Cross Section Measurements|next label=Cross Section Measurements}} | |||
<div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;"> | |||
<div style="width:280px;"> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | |||
'''Scatter Plots''' is used in particle-physics data analysis to turn detector output, simulated samples, and theoretical models into quantitative physics results. In high-energy experiments the term is connected with event selection, calibration, uncertainty treatment, validation, and comparison with Standard Model or beyond-Standard-Model predictions. The analysis task is usually defined by the observable being measured or the signal being searched for. A robust workflow keeps raw detector information, reconstructed objects, simulated events, control samples, and statistical models traceable so that assumptions can be checked and systematic uncertainties can be propagated. In practice, scatter plots must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration.</div> | |||
<div style="width:300px;"> | |||
[[File:Quantum_data_analysis_scatter_plots_yellow.png|thumb|280px|Scatter Plots represented as a compact particle-physics data analysis workflow.]] | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Overview == | |||
'''Scatter Plots''' is used in particle-physics data analysis to turn detector output, simulated samples, and theoretical models into quantitative physics results. In high-energy experiments the term is connected with event selection, calibration, uncertainty treatment, validation, and comparison with Standard Model or beyond-Standard-Model predictions. | |||
== Analysis role == | |||
The analysis task is usually defined by the observable being measured or the signal being searched for. A robust workflow keeps raw detector information, reconstructed objects, simulated events, control samples, and statistical models traceable so that assumptions can be checked and systematic uncertainties can be propagated. | |||
== Practical considerations == | |||
In practice, scatter plots must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration. This makes the result easier to compare across experiments and easier to reinterpret when improved simulations, calibrations, or theoretical predictions become available.<ref name="pdg-data">{{cite journal |collaboration=Particle Data Group |title=Review of Particle Physics |journal=Physical Review D |volume=110 |issue=3 |pages=030001 |year=2024 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001}}</ref> | |||
== Quality checks == | |||
For scatter plots, useful checks include closure tests on simulated samples, comparison with independent control regions, and stability tests under reasonable changes of selection, calibration, and binning. These checks help separate statistical fluctuations from analysis choices and detector effects. | |||
== Documentation == | |||
The page should record the definition of the objects being used, the data or simulation inputs, and the uncertainty model. That documentation is important because later measurements often reuse the same workflow with improved detector conditions or larger data sets. | |||
=See also= | =See also= | ||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 23 May 2026
Overview
Scatter Plots is used in particle-physics data analysis to turn detector output, simulated samples, and theoretical models into quantitative physics results. In high-energy experiments the term is connected with event selection, calibration, uncertainty treatment, validation, and comparison with Standard Model or beyond-Standard-Model predictions.
Analysis role
The analysis task is usually defined by the observable being measured or the signal being searched for. A robust workflow keeps raw detector information, reconstructed objects, simulated events, control samples, and statistical models traceable so that assumptions can be checked and systematic uncertainties can be propagated.
Practical considerations
In practice, scatter plots must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration. This makes the result easier to compare across experiments and easier to reinterpret when improved simulations, calibrations, or theoretical predictions become available.[1]
Quality checks
For scatter plots, useful checks include closure tests on simulated samples, comparison with independent control regions, and stability tests under reasonable changes of selection, calibration, and binning. These checks help separate statistical fluctuations from analysis choices and detector effects.
Documentation
The page should record the definition of the objects being used, the data or simulation inputs, and the uncertainty model. That documentation is important because later measurements often reuse the same workflow with improved detector conditions or larger data sets.
See also
Table of contents (60 articles)
Index
Full contents
References
- ↑ "Review of Particle Physics". Physical Review D 110 (3): 030001. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001.
Source attribution: Physics:Quantum data analysis/Scatter Plots
