Physics:Quantum instrument: Difference between revisions

From HandWiki Test
imported>WikiHarold
change
 
Restore missing Quantum reference definitions
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Mathematical abstraction of quantum measurement
{{Short description|Quantum physics topic}}
}}
 
In [[Physics:Quantum physics|quantum physics]], a '''quantum instrument''' is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement, capturing both the [[Physics:Classical physics|classical]] and [[Physics:Quantum physics|quantum]] outputs.<ref name=Alter2001>{{cite book| first1=Orly | last1=Alter |  first2=Yoshihisa | last2=Yamamoto | title=Quantum Measurement of a Single System | location=New York | publisher=Wiley | year=2001 | doi=10.1002/9783527617128 | isbn=9780471283089 }}</ref> It can be equivalently understood as a [[Quantum channel|quantum channel]] that takes as input a quantum system and has as its output two systems: a classical system containing the outcome of the measurement and a quantum system containing the post-measurement state.<ref name=Jordan2024>{{cite book| first1=Andrew N. | last1=Jordan | first2=Irfan A. | last2=Siddiqi | title=Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2024 | isbn= 978-1009100069}}
{{Quantum book backlink|Open quantum systems}}
</ref>
 
<div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;">
 
<div style="width:280px;">
__TOC__
</div>
 
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;">
A quantum instrument is a Book I topic in the Quantum Collection. It is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement that records both the probability of each classical outcome and the corresponding change in the quantum state. Unlike a simple observable, an instrument keeps track of measurement back-action, state update, and conditional dynamics. Quantum instruments are used in open systems, generalized measurements, quantum operations, feedback, tomography, and information theory. They make precise the idea that measurement is a physical process, not only a readout.
</div>
 
<div style="width:300px;">
[[File:Quantum_instrument_concept_map.svg|thumb|280px|instrument in the Quantum Collection.]]
</div>
 
</div>


==Definition==
==Definition==
Let <math>
Let <math>
X
X
</math> be a [[Countable set|countable set]] describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let <math>
</math> be a countable set describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let <math>
\{\mathcal{E}_x \}_{x\in X}
\{\mathcal{E}_x \}_{x\in X}
</math> denote a collection of trace-non-increasing [[Completely positive map|completely positive map]]s, such that the sum of all <math>
</math> denote a collection of trace-non-increasing completely positive maps, such that the sum of all <math>
\mathcal{E}_x
\mathcal{E}_x
</math> is trace-preserving, i.e. <math display="inline">
</math> is trace-preserving, i.e. <math display="inline">
Line 48: Line 63:
</math> is given by a quantum channel <math>
</math> is given by a quantum channel <math>
\mathcal{I}:\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_1) \rightarrow \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_2)\otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{|X|})
\mathcal{I}:\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_1) \rightarrow \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_2)\otimes \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{|X|})
</math>  with<ref name=Jordan2024></ref>
</math>  with<ref name=Jordan2024>{{cite book| first1=Andrew N. | last1=Jordan | first2=Irfan A. | last2=Siddiqi | title=Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2024 | isbn= 978-1009100069}}
</ref>


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 64: Line 80:
== Reductions and inductions ==
== Reductions and inductions ==


Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> In [[Biography:John A. Smolin|John Smolin]]'s terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger [[Hilbert space]]".  
Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> In [[Biography:John A. Smolin|John Smolin]]'s terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger Hilbert space".  


=== As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary ===
=== As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary ===
Line 72: Line 88:
defines a quantum instrument.<ref name=Busch2016></ref>  Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> can be obtained with this construction for some choice of <math>\eta</math> and <math>\{U_i\}</math>.<ref name=Busch2016></ref>
defines a quantum instrument.<ref name=Busch2016></ref>  Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> can be obtained with this construction for some choice of <math>\eta</math> and <math>\{U_i\}</math>.<ref name=Busch2016></ref>


In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the ''[[Quantum entanglement#Reduced density matrices|reduction]]'' of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary.
In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the ''reduction'' of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary.


=== Reduction to CPTP map ===
=== Reduction to CPTP map ===
Line 82: Line 98:
=== Reduction to POVM ===
=== Reduction to POVM ===


Any quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement ([[POVM]]):
Any quantum instrument <math>\{\mathcal{E}_i\}</math> immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement (POVM):
:<math>M_i := \sum_a K_a^{(i)\dagger} K_a^{(i)}</math>
:<math>M_i := \sum_a K_a^{(i)\dagger} K_a^{(i)}</math>
where <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are any choice of Kraus operators for <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>,<ref name=Busch2016></ref>
where <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are any choice of Kraus operators for <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>,<ref name=Busch2016></ref>
Line 88: Line 104:
The Kraus operators <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are not uniquely determined by the CP maps <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>, but the above definition of the POVM elements <math>M_i</math> is the same for any choice.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away.
The Kraus operators <math>K_a^{(i)}</math> are not uniquely determined by the CP maps <math>\mathcal{E}_i</math>, but the above definition of the POVM elements <math>M_i</math> is the same for any choice.<ref name=Busch2016></ref> The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away.


== References ==
= References =
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}



Latest revision as of 00:31, 24 May 2026


A quantum instrument is a Book I topic in the Quantum Collection. It is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement that records both the probability of each classical outcome and the corresponding change in the quantum state. Unlike a simple observable, an instrument keeps track of measurement back-action, state update, and conditional dynamics. Quantum instruments are used in open systems, generalized measurements, quantum operations, feedback, tomography, and information theory. They make precise the idea that measurement is a physical process, not only a readout.

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
instrument in the Quantum Collection.

Definition

Let X be a countable set describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let {x}xX denote a collection of trace-non-increasing completely positive maps, such that the sum of all x is trace-preserving, i.e. tr(xx(ρ))=tr(ρ) for all positive operators ρ.

Now for describing a measurement by an instrument , the maps x are used to model the mapping from an input state ρ to the output state of a measurement conditioned on a classical measurement outcome x. Therefore, the probability that a specific measurement outcome x occurs on a state ρ is given by[1][2] p(x|ρ)=tr(x(ρ)).

The state after a measurement with the specific outcome x is given by[1][2]

ρx=x(ρ)tr(x(ρ)).

If the measurement outcomes are recorded in a classical register, whose states are modeled by a set of orthonormal projections |xx|(|X|) , then the action of an instrument is given by a quantum channel :(1)(2)(|X|) with[3]

(ρ):=xx(ρ)|xx|.

Here 1 and 2|X| are the Hilbert spaces corresponding to the input and the output systems of the instrument.

Reductions and inductions

Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.[2] In John Smolin's terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger Hilbert space".

As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary

Any quantum instrument on a system 𝒮 can be modeled as a projective measurement on 𝒮 and (jointly) an uncorrelated auxiliary 𝒜 followed by a unitary conditional on the measurement outcome.[1][2] Let η (with η>0 and Trη=1) be the normalized initial state of 𝒜, let {Πi} (with Πi=Πi=Πi2 and ΠiΠj=δijΠi) be a projective measurement on 𝒮𝒜, and let {Ui} (with Ui=Ui1) be unitaries on 𝒮𝒜. Then one can check that

i(ρ):=Tr𝒜(UiΠi(ρη)ΠiUi)

defines a quantum instrument.[2] Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument {i} can be obtained with this construction for some choice of η and {Ui}.[2]

In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the reduction of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary.

Reduction to CPTP map

Any quantum instrument {i} immediately induces a CPTP map, i.e., a quantum channel:[2]

(ρ):=ii(ρ).

This can be thought of as the overall effect of the measurement on the quantum system if the measurement outcome is thrown away.

Reduction to POVM

Any quantum instrument {i} immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement (POVM):

Mi:=aKa(i)Ka(i)

where Ka(i) are any choice of Kraus operators for i,[2]

i(ρ)=aKa(i)ρKa(i).

The Kraus operators Ka(i) are not uniquely determined by the CP maps i, but the above definition of the POVM elements Mi is the same for any choice.[2] The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ozawa, Masanao (1984). "Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables". Journal of Mathematical Physics 25: 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.526000. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka; Pellonpää, Juha-Pekka; Ylinen, Kari (2016). Quantum measurement. 23. Springer. pp. 261--262. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43389-9. ISBN 978-3-319-43387-5. 
  3. Jordan, Andrew N.; Siddiqi, Irfan A. (2024). Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1009100069. 

Source attribution: Quantum instrument