Physics:Quantum Lawson criterion: Difference between revisions

From HandWiki Test
imported>WikiHarold
Fix Matter see-also invoke
Normalize quantum page header order
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Criterion for igniting a nuclear fusion chain reaction}}
{{Short description|Criterion for igniting a nuclear fusion chain reaction}}
{{Quantum matter backlink|Plasma and fusion physics}}
{{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum magnetic confinement|previous label=Magnetic confinement|next=Physics:Quantum Quark–gluon plasma|next label=Quark–gluon plasma}}
<div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;">


{{Quantum matter backlink|Plasma and fusion physics}}
<div style="width:280px;">
__TOC__
</div>


The '''Lawson criterion''' is a [[figure of merit]] used in [[Physics:Quantum Fusion|nuclear fusion]] research. It compares the rate of energy generated by fusion reactions within fusion fuel to the rate of energy losses from the plasma environment. When the rate of energy production exceeds the rate of energy loss, the fusion system can produce net energy. If enough of this energy is retained within the plasma to sustain further reactions, the plasma reaches [[Physics:Quantum Fusion#Ignition|ignition]].<ref name="Lawson"/>
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;">
The '''Lawson criterion''' is a figure of merit used in [[Physics:Quantum Fusion|nuclear fusion]] research. It compares the rate of energy generated by fusion reactions within fusion fuel to the rate of energy losses from the plasma environment. When the rate of energy production exceeds the rate of energy loss, the fusion system can produce net energy. If enough of this energy is retained within the plasma to sustain further reactions, the plasma reaches [[Physics:Quantum Fusion#Ignition|ignition]].<ref name="Lawson"/>


The concept was first developed by [[John D. Lawson (scientist)|John D. Lawson]] in a classified 1955 report at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment in Harwell, United Kingdom.<ref>{{cite tech report
The concept was first developed by John D. Lawson in a classified 1955 report at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment in Harwell, United Kingdom.<ref>{{Dead link|date=November 2023}}</ref> The work was later declassified and formally published in 1957.<ref name="Lawson">{{Cite journal
|last=Lawson
|first=J. D.
|title=Some criteria for a useful thermonuclear reactor
|date=December 1955
|issue=A.E.R.E. GP/R 1807
|institution=Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, Berkshire, U. K.
|url=[https://www.euro-fusion.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Archive/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/dec05-aere-gpr1807.pdf](https://www.euro-fusion.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Archive/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/dec05-aere-gpr1807.pdf)
}}{{Dead link|date=November 2023}}</ref> The work was later declassified and formally published in 1957.<ref name="Lawson">{{Cite journal
|last=Lawson
|last=Lawson
|first=J. D.
|first=J. D.
Line 28: Line 26:
As originally formulated, the Lawson criterion defines a minimum value for the product of plasma density and energy confinement time required to obtain net fusion power. Later refinements introduced the more useful '''fusion triple product''', which combines plasma density, temperature, and confinement time into a single performance measure.<ref name="Lawson"/>
As originally formulated, the Lawson criterion defines a minimum value for the product of plasma density and energy confinement time required to obtain net fusion power. Later refinements introduced the more useful '''fusion triple product''', which combines plasma density, temperature, and confinement time into a single performance measure.<ref name="Lawson"/>


On 8 August 2021, researchers at the [[National Ignition Facility]] at [[Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory]] announced an inertial confinement fusion experiment that exceeded the Lawson criterion for ignition conditions.<ref>{{cite web
On 8 August 2021, researchers at the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory announced an inertial confinement fusion experiment that exceeded the Lawson criterion for ignition conditions.<ref>{{cite web
|url=[https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieved-self-sustaining-nuclear-fusion-but-now-they-cant-replicate-it](https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieved-self-sustaining-nuclear-fusion-but-now-they-cant-replicate-it)
|url=[https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieved-self-sustaining-nuclear-fusion-but-now-they-cant-replicate-it](https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieved-self-sustaining-nuclear-fusion-but-now-they-cant-replicate-it)
|title=Scientists Achieved Self-Sustaining Nuclear Fusion… But Now They Can't Replicate It
|title=Scientists Achieved Self-Sustaining Nuclear Fusion… But Now They Can't Replicate It
Line 57: Line 55:
|doi-access=free
|doi-access=free
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
<div style="float:right; border:1px solid #e0d890; background:#fff8cc; padding:6px; margin:0 0 1em 1em; width:420px;">
 
[[File:The Lawson Criterion.png|400px]]
<div style="font-size:90%;">Lawson criterion and triple-product performance of major magnetic confinement fusion experiments.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="width:300px;">
[[File:The Lawson Criterion.png|thumb|280px|Lawson criterion and triple-product performance of major magnetic confinement fusion experiments.]]
</div>
</div>
== Energy balance ==
== Energy balance ==


Line 68: Line 71:


#'''Fusion''' is the energy generated by nuclear fusion reactions.
#'''Fusion''' is the energy generated by nuclear fusion reactions.
#'''Radiation loss''' is the energy lost through electromagnetic radiation such as [[X-rays]].
#'''Radiation loss''' is the energy lost through electromagnetic radiation such as X-rays.
#'''Conduction loss''' is the energy carried away by escaping plasma particles.
#'''Conduction loss''' is the energy carried away by escaping plasma particles.
#'''Efficiency''' measures how effectively the reactor converts fusion energy into useful power.
#'''Efficiency''' measures how effectively the reactor converts fusion energy into useful power.


Lawson estimated the fusion power using a thermalized plasma obeying a [[Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution]].<ref name="autogenerated1963">{{Cite journal
Lawson estimated the fusion power using a thermalized plasma obeying a Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution.<ref name="autogenerated1963">{{Cite journal
|last1=Spitzer
|last1=Spitzer
|first1=Lyman
|first1=Lyman
Line 98: Line 101:


* <math>n_A</math> and <math>n_B</math> are the number densities of the fusion fuels,
* <math>n_A</math> and <math>n_B</math> are the number densities of the fusion fuels,
* <math>\sigma</math> is the fusion [[Cross section (physics)|cross section]],
* <math>\sigma</math> is the fusion cross section,
* <math>v</math> is the relative particle velocity,
* <math>v</math> is the relative particle velocity,
* <math>E</math> is the fusion energy released per reaction.
* <math>E</math> is the fusion energy released per reaction.
Line 110: Line 113:
By balancing fusion power against radiation losses, Lawson estimated minimum ignition temperatures of approximately:
By balancing fusion power against radiation losses, Lawson estimated minimum ignition temperatures of approximately:


* 30 million K (2.6 keV) for the [[deuterium]]–[[tritium]] reaction,
* 30 million K (2.6 keV) for the [[Physics:Quantum deuteron|deuterium]]–tritium reaction,
* 150 million K (12.9 keV) for the deuterium–deuterium reaction.<ref name="Lawson"/><ref>{{Cite web
* 150 million K (12.9 keV) for the deuterium–deuterium reaction.<ref name="Lawson"/><ref>{{Cite web
   |title=Energy Converter
   |title=Energy Converter
Line 166: Line 169:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Major fusion experiments such as [[JT-60]], [[TFTR]], [[JET]], and [[ITER]] are often evaluated using the triple-product diagram shown above.<ref>{{cite web
Major fusion experiments such as JT-60, TFTR, JET, and ITER are often evaluated using the triple-product diagram shown above.<ref>{{cite web
|url=[http://www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/html/exp_rep/rep36.html](http://www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/html/exp_rep/rep36.html)
|url=[http://www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/html/exp_rep/rep36.html](http://www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/html/exp_rep/rep36.html)
|title=World Highest Fusion Triple Product Marked in High-βp H-mode Plasmas
|title=World Highest Fusion Triple Product Marked in High-βp H-mode Plasmas
Line 175: Line 178:
== Inertial confinement ==
== Inertial confinement ==


The Lawson criterion also applies to [[Physics:Quantum Magnetic confinement fusion|magnetic confinement fusion]] and [[inertial confinement fusion]]. In inertial confinement systems, confinement time is determined by the expansion time of the compressed fuel pellet.
The Lawson criterion also applies to [[Physics:Quantum Magnetic confinement fusion|magnetic confinement fusion]] and inertial confinement fusion. In inertial confinement systems, confinement time is determined by the expansion time of the compressed fuel pellet.


For inertial confinement fusion, the criterion is often written as:
For inertial confinement fusion, the criterion is often written as:
Line 201: Line 204:
== Non-thermal systems ==
== Non-thermal systems ==


The Lawson criterion was originally derived for thermalized plasmas, but some fusion concepts use non-thermal particle distributions. Examples include the [[fusor]], [[polywell]], and [[migma]] concepts.
The Lawson criterion was originally derived for thermalized plasmas, but some fusion concepts use non-thermal particle distributions. Examples include the fusor, polywell, and migma concepts.


In such systems, energy losses from radiation and particle conduction remain major obstacles to net energy production.<ref>{{Cite journal
In such systems, energy losses from radiation and particle conduction remain major obstacles to net energy production.<ref>{{Cite journal

Latest revision as of 11:34, 22 May 2026

← Previous : Magnetic confinement
Next : Quark–gluon plasma →

The Lawson criterion is a figure of merit used in nuclear fusion research. It compares the rate of energy generated by fusion reactions within fusion fuel to the rate of energy losses from the plasma environment. When the rate of energy production exceeds the rate of energy loss, the fusion system can produce net energy. If enough of this energy is retained within the plasma to sustain further reactions, the plasma reaches ignition.[1]

The concept was first developed by John D. Lawson in a classified 1955 report at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment in Harwell, United Kingdom.[2] The work was later declassified and formally published in 1957.[1]

As originally formulated, the Lawson criterion defines a minimum value for the product of plasma density and energy confinement time required to obtain net fusion power. Later refinements introduced the more useful fusion triple product, which combines plasma density, temperature, and confinement time into a single performance measure.[1]

On 8 August 2021, researchers at the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory announced an inertial confinement fusion experiment that exceeded the Lawson criterion for ignition conditions.[3][4]

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Lawson criterion and triple-product performance of major magnetic confinement fusion experiments.

Energy balance

The Lawson criterion is based on the energy balance of a fusion plasma. A fusion reactor can only produce net power when the fusion heating exceeds all energy losses.

Net power = Efficiency × (Fusion − Radiation loss − Conduction loss)

  1. Fusion is the energy generated by nuclear fusion reactions.
  2. Radiation loss is the energy lost through electromagnetic radiation such as X-rays.
  3. Conduction loss is the energy carried away by escaping plasma particles.
  4. Efficiency measures how effectively the reactor converts fusion energy into useful power.

Lawson estimated the fusion power using a thermalized plasma obeying a Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution.[5]

The volumetric fusion reaction rate is approximately:

Fusion rate=nAnBσvE

where:

  • nA and nB are the number densities of the fusion fuels,
  • σ is the fusion cross section,
  • v is the relative particle velocity,
  • E is the fusion energy released per reaction.

Lawson also estimated radiation losses using the bremsstrahlung relation:

P_B = 1.4 \times 10^{-34} N^2 T^{1/2} \frac{\mathrm{W}}{\mathrm{cm}^3}

where N is the plasma number density and T is the plasma temperature.[1]

By balancing fusion power against radiation losses, Lawson estimated minimum ignition temperatures of approximately:

  • 30 million K (2.6 keV) for the deuterium–tritium reaction,
  • 150 million K (12.9 keV) for the deuterium–deuterium reaction.[1][6]

Confinement time

The energy confinement time τE measures how long a plasma retains its energy before losses dominate.

\tau_E = \frac{W}{P_{\mathrm{loss}}}

where:

  • W is the plasma energy density,
  • Ploss is the power loss density.

For a steady-state fusion reactor, fusion heating must at least balance energy losses:

f E_{\rm ch} \ge P_{\rm loss}

For a 50–50 deuterium–tritium plasma, the Lawson criterion becomes:

n\tau_E \ge \frac{12T}{E_{\rm ch}\langle\sigma v\rangle}

For the D–T reaction, the minimum required value is approximately:

n\tau_E \ge 1.5 \times 10^{20}\ \frac{\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{m}^3}

The minimum occurs near a plasma temperature of approximately 26 keV.[1]

Triple product

A more useful performance parameter is the fusion triple product:

nT\tau_E

This combines plasma density, temperature, and confinement time. For the D–T reaction, the minimum required triple product is approximately:

nT\tau_E \ge 3 \times 10^{21}\ \mathrm{keV\ s\ m^{-3}}

The optimum temperature for this condition is near 14 keV.[7]

Major fusion experiments such as JT-60, TFTR, JET, and ITER are often evaluated using the triple-product diagram shown above.[8]

Inertial confinement

The Lawson criterion also applies to magnetic confinement fusion and inertial confinement fusion. In inertial confinement systems, confinement time is determined by the expansion time of the compressed fuel pellet.

For inertial confinement fusion, the criterion is often written as:

\rho R \ge 1\ \mathrm{g/cm^2}

where:

  • ρ is the fuel density,
  • R is the fuel radius.

Achieving this condition generally requires extremely high compression ratios produced by powerful laser systems.[9]

Non-thermal systems

The Lawson criterion was originally derived for thermalized plasmas, but some fusion concepts use non-thermal particle distributions. Examples include the fusor, polywell, and migma concepts.

In such systems, energy losses from radiation and particle conduction remain major obstacles to net energy production.[10]

See also

Table of contents (84 articles)

Index

Full contents

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lawson, J. D. (1957). "Some Criteria for a Power Producing Thermonuclear Reactor". Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section B 70 (1): 6–10. doi:10.1088/0370-1301/70/1/303. Bibcode: 1957PPSB...70....6L. 
  2. [|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  3. [[1](https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieved-self-sustaining-nuclear-fusion-but-now-they-cant-replicate-it) "Scientists Achieved Self-Sustaining Nuclear Fusion… But Now They Can't Replicate It"]. ScienceAlert. August 16, 2022. [2](https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-achieved-self-sustaining-nuclear-fusion-but-now-they-cant-replicate-it). 
  4. Abu-Shawareb, H.; Acree, R.; Adams, P.; Adams, J.; Addis, B. (2022-08-08). "Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment". Physical Review Letters 129 (7). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.075001. PMID 36018710. Bibcode: 2022PhRvL.129g5001A. 
  5. Spitzer, Lyman; Seeger, Raymond J. (1963). "Physics of Fully Ionized Gases". American Journal of Physics 31 (11): 890–891. doi:10.1119/1.1969155. Bibcode: 1963AmJPh..31..890S. 
  6. [[3](https://www.phys.ksu.edu/personal/cdlin/phystable/econvert.html) "Energy Converter"]. Kansas State University. [4](https://www.phys.ksu.edu/personal/cdlin/phystable/econvert.html). 
  7. Wesson, J. (2004). [[5](https://pdfhost.io/view/NMf0wmfoq_Wesson_J_Tokamaks_3Ed_Oxford_2004_K_T_755Spdf) "Tokamaks"]. Oxford Engineering Science Series (Oxford: Clarendon Press) (48). [6](https://pdfhost.io/view/NMf0wmfoq_Wesson_J_Tokamaks_3Ed_Oxford_2004_K_T_755Spdf). 
  8. [[7](http://www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/html/exp_rep/rep36.html) "World Highest Fusion Triple Product Marked in High-βp H-mode Plasmas"]. [8](http://www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/html/exp_rep/rep36.html). 
  9. Hirsch, Robert L. (1967). "Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement of Ionized Fusion Gases". Journal of Applied Physics 38 (11): 4522–4534. doi:10.1063/1.1709162. Bibcode: 1967JAP....38.4522H. 
  10. Rider, Todd H. (1997-04-01). "Fundamental limitations on plasma fusion systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium". Physics of Plasmas 4 (4): 1039–1046. doi:10.1063/1.872556. Bibcode: 1997PhPl....4.1039R. 


Author: Harold Foppele


Source attribution: Physics:Quantum Lawson criterion