Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse: Difference between revisions
Arrange page top as TOC lead image columns |
Normalize quantum page header order |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Quantum Collection topic on Quantum Measurement collapse}} | {{Short description|Quantum Collection topic on Quantum Measurement collapse}} | ||
{{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}} | {{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}} | ||
{{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum Weak measurement|previous label=Weak measurement|next=Physics:Quantum entanglement|next label=Entanglement}} | |||
<div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;"> | <div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;"> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | <div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | ||
'''Measurement collapse''' in quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. Here the coefficients c_i are probability amplitudes, given by | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 26: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Here the coefficients <math>c_i</math> are | Here the coefficients <math>c_i</math> are probability amplitudes, given by | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
| Line 62: | Line 56: | ||
Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.<ref name="Hall">{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Brian C. |title=Quantum Theory for Mathematicians |publisher=Springer |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4614-7115-8 |page=68}}</ref> For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities. | Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.<ref name="Hall">{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Brian C. |title=Quantum Theory for Mathematicians |publisher=Springer |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4614-7115-8 |page=68}}</ref> For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities. | ||
Examples include the | Examples include the double-slit experiment, where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.<ref name="Bach2013">{{cite journal | last1=Bach | first1=Roger | last2=Pope | first2=Damian | last3=Liou | first3=Sy-Hwang | last4=Batelaan | first4=Herman | title=Controlled double-slit electron diffraction | journal=New Journal of Physics | volume=15 | issue=3 | year=2013 | article-number=033018 | doi=10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018 }}</ref> | ||
== The measurement problem == | == The measurement problem == | ||
The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the | The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.<ref name="Zurek2003">{{Cite journal |last=Zurek |first=Wojciech Hubert |title=Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=715–775 |year=2003 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715}}</ref> | ||
To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the | To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.<ref name="Susskind">{{Cite book |last1=Susskind |first1=Leonard |last2=Friedman |first2=Art |title=Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum |publisher=Basic Books |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-465-06290-4}}</ref> | ||
== Interpretations == | == Interpretations == | ||
| Line 74: | Line 68: | ||
Different interpretations of quantum mechanics treat collapse in different ways. | Different interpretations of quantum mechanics treat collapse in different ways. | ||
* In the | * In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory. | ||
* In the | * In the many-worlds interpretation, collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches. | ||
* In | * In objective-collapse theory, collapse is treated as a real physical process. | ||
* In approaches based on | * In approaches based on quantum decoherence, interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.<ref name="Schlosshauer">{{cite journal |last=Schlosshauer |first=Maximilian |title=Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=1267–1305 |year=2005 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267}}</ref> | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
The idea of wave function reduction appeared early in the development of quantum mechanics. | The idea of wave function reduction appeared early in the development of quantum mechanics. Werner Heisenberg used it in 1927 in discussing quantum measurement, and John von Neumann gave it a systematic mathematical formulation in 1932.<ref name="Kiefer">{{Cite book |last=Kiefer |first=Claus |chapter=On the Interpretation of Quantum Theory — from Copenhagen to the Present Day |title=Time, Quantum and Information |publisher=Springer |year=2003 |pages=291–299 |doi=10.1007/978-3-662-10557-3_19}}</ref> | ||
=See also= | =See also= | ||
Latest revision as of 11:32, 22 May 2026
Measurement collapse in quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. Here the coefficients c_i are probability amplitudes, given by
Mathematical description
A quantum state may be expanded in a basis of eigenstates of an observable:
Here the coefficients are probability amplitudes, given by
When the observable is measured, the state is postulated to collapse to one of the eigenstates:
The probability that the outcome corresponding to is obtained is
with normalization
This collapse postulate is introduced to account for the fact that an immediately repeated measurement gives the same result.[1]
Physical meaning
Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.[2] For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities.
Examples include the double-slit experiment, where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.[3]
The measurement problem
The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.[4]
To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.[5]
Interpretations
Different interpretations of quantum mechanics treat collapse in different ways.
- In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory.
- In the many-worlds interpretation, collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
- In objective-collapse theory, collapse is treated as a real physical process.
- In approaches based on quantum decoherence, interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.[6]
History
The idea of wave function reduction appeared early in the development of quantum mechanics. Werner Heisenberg used it in 1927 in discussing quantum measurement, and John von Neumann gave it a systematic mathematical formulation in 1932.[7]
See also
Table of contents (217 articles)
Index
Full contents
References
- ↑ Griffiths, David J.; Schroeter, Darrell F. (2018). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (3 ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-18963-8.
- ↑ Hall, Brian C. (2013). Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Springer. p. 68. ISBN 978-1-4614-7115-8.
- ↑ Bach, Roger; Pope, Damian; Liou, Sy-Hwang; Batelaan, Herman (2013). "Controlled double-slit electron diffraction". New Journal of Physics 15 (3). doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018.
- ↑ Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (2003). "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical". Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (3): 715–775. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715.
- ↑ Susskind, Leonard; Friedman, Art (2014). Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-06290-4.
- ↑ Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2005). "Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics". Reviews of Modern Physics 76 (4): 1267–1305. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267.
- ↑ Kiefer, Claus (2003). "On the Interpretation of Quantum Theory — from Copenhagen to the Present Day". Time, Quantum and Information. Springer. pp. 291–299. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10557-3_19.
Source attribution: Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse

