Latest revision as of 11:32, 22 May 2026

← Back to Measurement and information Book I

Measurement collapse in quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. Here the coefficients c_i are probability amplitudes, given by

Mathematical description

A quantum state may be expanded in a basis of eigenstates ${| ϕ_{i} ⟩}$ of an observable:

$| ψ ⟩ = \sum_{i} c_{i} | ϕ_{i} ⟩ .$

Here the coefficients $c_{i}$ are probability amplitudes, given by

$c_{i} = ⟨ ϕ_{i} | ψ ⟩ .$

When the observable is measured, the state is postulated to collapse to one of the eigenstates:

$| ψ ⟩ = \sum_{i} c_{i} | ϕ_{i} ⟩ \mapsto | ϕ_{i} ⟩ .$

The probability that the outcome corresponding to $| ϕ_{i} ⟩$ is obtained is

$P (i) = | c_{i} |^{2},$

with normalization

$\sum_{i} | c_{i} |^{2} = 1.$

This collapse postulate is introduced to account for the fact that an immediately repeated measurement gives the same result.^[1]

Physical meaning

Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.^[2] For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities.

Examples include the double-slit experiment, where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.^[3]

The measurement problem

The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.^[4]

To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.^[5]

Interpretations

Different interpretations of quantum mechanics treat collapse in different ways.

In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory.
In the many-worlds interpretation, collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
In objective-collapse theory, collapse is treated as a real physical process.
In approaches based on quantum decoherence, interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.^[6]

History

The idea of wave function reduction appeared early in the development of quantum mechanics. Werner Heisenberg used it in 1927 in discussing quantum measurement, and John von Neumann gave it a systematic mathematical formulation in 1932.^[7]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Short description|Quantum Collection topic on Quantum Measurement collapse}}
 {{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}}
+{{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum Weak measurement|previous label=Weak measurement|next=Physics:Quantum entanglement|next label=Entanglement}}
 <div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;">
@@ Line 10: / Line 9: @@
 <div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;">
-'''Measurement collapse''' is a Book I topic in the Quantum Collection. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome.{{cite book }} Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation.
+'''Measurement collapse''' in quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. Here the coefficients c_i are probability amplitudes, given by
 </div>
@@ Line 27: / Line 26: @@
 </math>
-Here the coefficients <math>c_i</math> are [[probability amplitude]]s, given by
+Here the coefficients <math>c_i</math> are probability amplitudes, given by
 <math display="block">
@@ Line 57: / Line 56: @@
 Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.<ref name="Hall">{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Brian C. |title=Quantum Theory for Mathematicians |publisher=Springer |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4614-7115-8 |page=68}}</ref> For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities.
-Examples include the [[double-slit experiment]], where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.<ref name="Bach2013">{{cite journal | last1=Bach | first1=Roger | last2=Pope | first2=Damian | last3=Liou | first3=Sy-Hwang | last4=Batelaan | first4=Herman | title=Controlled double-slit electron diffraction | journal=New Journal of Physics | volume=15 | issue=3 | year=2013 | article-number=033018 | doi=10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018 }}</ref>
+Examples include the double-slit experiment, where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.<ref name="Bach2013">{{cite journal | last1=Bach | first1=Roger | last2=Pope | first2=Damian | last3=Liou | first3=Sy-Hwang | last4=Batelaan | first4=Herman | title=Controlled double-slit electron diffraction | journal=New Journal of Physics | volume=15 | issue=3 | year=2013 | article-number=033018 | doi=10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018 }}</ref>
 == The measurement problem ==
-The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the [[measurement problem]] of quantum mechanics.<ref name="Zurek2003">{{Cite journal |last=Zurek |first=Wojciech Hubert |title=Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=715–775 |year=2003 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715}}</ref>
+The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.<ref name="Zurek2003">{{Cite journal |last=Zurek |first=Wojciech Hubert |title=Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=715–775 |year=2003 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715}}</ref>
 To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.<ref name="Susskind">{{Cite book |last1=Susskind |first1=Leonard |last2=Friedman |first2=Art |title=Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum |publisher=Basic Books |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-465-06290-4}}</ref>
@@ Line 70: / Line 69: @@
 * In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory.
-* In the [[many-worlds interpretation]], collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
+* In the many-worlds interpretation, collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
-* In [[objective-collapse theory]], collapse is treated as a real physical process.
+* In objective-collapse theory, collapse is treated as a real physical process.
-* In approaches based on [[quantum decoherence]], interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.<ref name="Schlosshauer">{{cite journal |last=Schlosshauer |first=Maximilian |title=Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=1267–1305 |year=2005 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267}}</ref>
+* In approaches based on quantum decoherence, interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.<ref name="Schlosshauer">{{cite journal |last=Schlosshauer |first=Maximilian |title=Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=1267–1305 |year=2005 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267}}</ref>
 == History ==

Anonymous

Search

Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 11:32, 22 May 2026

Mathematical description

Physical meaning

The measurement problem

Interpretations

History

See also

Table of contents (217 articles)

Index

Full contents

References

Navigation

Wiki tools

Page tools