Physics:Quantum Markov semigroup: Difference between revisions
Arrange page top as TOC lead image columns |
WikiHarold (talk | contribs) Use Quantum See also index module |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|A kind of mathematical structure which describes the dynamics in a Markovian open quantum system.}} | {{Short description|A kind of mathematical structure which describes the dynamics in a Markovian open quantum system.}} | ||
{{Quantum book backlink|Open quantum systems}} | {{Quantum book backlink|Open quantum systems}} | ||
{{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum dissipation|previous label=Dissipation|next=Physics:Quantum Markovian dynamics|next label=Markovian dynamics}} | |||
<div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;"> | <div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;"> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | <div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | ||
'''Markov semigroup''' in quantum mechanics, a quantum Markov semigroup describes the dynamics in a Markovian open quantum system. The axiomatic definition of the prototype of quantum Markov semigroups was first introduced by A. Kossakowski in 1972, and then developed by V. In quantum mechanics, a quantum Markov semigroup describes the dynamics in a Markovian open quantum system. The axiomatic definition of the prototype of quantum Markov semigroups was first introduced by A. Kossakowski in 1972, and then developed by V. An ideal quantum system is not realistic because it should be completely isolated while, in practice, it is influenced by the coupling to an environment, which typically has a large number of degrees of freedom (for example an atom interacting with the surrounding radiation field). | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width:300px;"> | <div style="width:300px;"> | ||
[[File: | [[File:Quantum Markov semigroup.png|thumb|240px]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
==Motivation== | ==Motivation== | ||
An ideal [[Physics:Quantum system|quantum system]] is not realistic because it should be completely isolated while, in practice, it is influenced by the [[Physics:Quantum coupling|coupling]] to an environment, which typically has a large number of degrees of freedom (for example an | An ideal [[Physics:Quantum system|quantum system]] is not realistic because it should be completely isolated while, in practice, it is influenced by the [[Physics:Quantum coupling|coupling]] to an environment, which typically has a large number of degrees of freedom (for example an atom interacting with the surrounding radiation field). A complete microscopic description of the degrees of freedom of the environment is typically too complicated. Hence, one looks for simpler descriptions of the dynamics of the open system. In principle, one should investigate the unitary dynamics of the total system, i.e. the system and the environment, to obtain information about the reduced system of interest by averaging the appropriate observables over the degrees of freedom of the environment. To model the dissipative effects due to the interaction with the environment, the Schrödinger equation is replaced by a suitable master equation, such as a Lindblad equation or a stochastic Schrödinger equation in which the infinite degrees of freedom of the environment are "synthesized" as a few [[Physics:Quantum noise|quantum noise]]s. Mathematically, time evolution in a Markovian open quantum system is no longer described by means of one-parameter groups of unitary maps, but one needs to introduce '''quantum Markov semigroups'''. | ||
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
===Quantum dynamical semigroup (QDS)=== | ===Quantum dynamical semigroup (QDS)=== | ||
In general, quantum dynamical semigroups can be defined on | In general, quantum dynamical semigroups can be defined on von Neumann algebras, so the dimensionality of the system could be infinite. Let <math> \mathcal{A} </math> be a von Neumann algebra acting on Hilbert space <math> \mathcal{H} </math>, a quantum dynamical semigroup on <math> \mathcal{A} </math> is a collection of bounded operators on <math> \mathcal{A} </math>, denoted by <math> \mathcal{T} := \left( \mathcal{T}_t \right)_{t \ge 0} </math>, with the following properties:<ref name="QMS-FF">{{cite journal |last1=Fagnola |first1=Franco |title=Quantum Markov semigroups and quantum flows |journal=Proyecciones |date=1999 |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=1–144 |doi=10.22199/S07160917.1999.0003.00002 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247317142|doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
# <math> \mathcal{T}_0 \left( a \right) = a </math>, <math> \forall a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, | # <math> \mathcal{T}_0 \left( a \right) = a </math>, <math> \forall a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, | ||
# <math> \mathcal{T}_{t + s} \left( a \right) = \mathcal{T}_t \left( \mathcal{T}_s \left( a \right) \right) </math>, <math> \forall s, t \ge 0 </math>, <math> \forall a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, | # <math> \mathcal{T}_{t + s} \left( a \right) = \mathcal{T}_t \left( \mathcal{T}_s \left( a \right) \right) </math>, <math> \forall s, t \ge 0 </math>, <math> \forall a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
# <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> is a <math> \sigma </math>-weakly continuous operator in <math> \mathcal{A} </math> for all <math> t \ge 0 </math>, | # <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> is a <math> \sigma </math>-weakly continuous operator in <math> \mathcal{A} </math> for all <math> t \ge 0 </math>, | ||
# For all <math> a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, the map <math> t \mapsto \mathcal{T}_t \left( a \right) </math> is continuous with respect to the <math> \sigma </math>-weak topology on <math> \mathcal{A} </math>. | # For all <math> a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, the map <math> t \mapsto \mathcal{T}_t \left( a \right) </math> is continuous with respect to the <math> \sigma </math>-weak topology on <math> \mathcal{A} </math>. | ||
It is worth mentioning that, under the condition of complete positivity, the operators <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> are <math> \sigma </math>-weakly continuous if and only if <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> are normal.<ref name="QMS-FF" /> Recall that, letting <math> \mathcal{A}_+ </math> denote the | It is worth mentioning that, under the condition of complete positivity, the operators <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> are <math> \sigma </math>-weakly continuous if and only if <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> are normal.<ref name="QMS-FF" /> Recall that, letting <math> \mathcal{A}_+ </math> denote the convex cone of positive elements in <math> \mathcal{A} </math>, a positive operator <math> T : \mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{A} </math> is said to be normal if for every increasing net <math> \left( x_\alpha \right)_\alpha </math> in <math> \mathcal{A}_+ </math> with least upper bound <math> x </math> in <math> \mathcal{A}_+ </math> one has | ||
:<math> \lim_{\alpha} \langle u, (T x_\alpha) u \rangle = \sup_{\alpha} \langle u, (T x_\alpha) u \rangle = \langle u, (T x) u \rangle </math> | :<math> \lim_{\alpha} \langle u, (T x_\alpha) u \rangle = \sup_{\alpha} \langle u, (T x_\alpha) u \rangle = \langle u, (T x) u \rangle </math> | ||
for each <math> u </math> in a | for each <math> u </math> in a norm-dense linear sub-manifold of <math> \mathcal{H} </math>. | ||
===Quantum Markov semigroup (QMS)=== | ===Quantum Markov semigroup (QMS)=== | ||
| Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
A quantum dynamical semigroup <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is said to be identity-preserving (or conservative, or Markovian) if | A quantum dynamical semigroup <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is said to be identity-preserving (or conservative, or Markovian) if | ||
{{NumBlk|:|<math> \mathcal{T}_t \left( \boldsymbol{1} \right) = \boldsymbol{1}, \quad \forall t \ge 0, </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | {{NumBlk|:|<math> \mathcal{T}_t \left( \boldsymbol{1} \right) = \boldsymbol{1}, \quad \forall t \ge 0, </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | ||
where <math> \boldsymbol{1} \in \mathcal{A} </math> is the identity element. For simplicity, <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is called quantum Markov semigroup. Notice that, the identity-preserving property and | where <math> \boldsymbol{1} \in \mathcal{A} </math> is the identity element. For simplicity, <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is called quantum Markov semigroup. Notice that, the identity-preserving property and positivity of <math> \mathcal{T}_t </math> imply <math> \left\| \mathcal{T}_t \right\| = 1 </math> for all <math> t \ge 0 </math> and then <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is a contraction semigroup.<ref name="Operator-alg-Bratteli">{{cite book |last1=Bratteli |first1=Ola |last2=Robinson |first2=Derek William |title=Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics |date=1987 |publisher=Springer-Verlag |location=New York |isbn=3-540-17093-6 |edition=2nd}}</ref> | ||
The Condition ({{EquationNote|1}}) plays an important role not only in the proof of uniqueness and unitarity of solution of a | The Condition ({{EquationNote|1}}) plays an important role not only in the proof of uniqueness and unitarity of solution of a Hudson–Parthasarathy quantum stochastic differential equation, but also in deducing regularity conditions for paths of classical Markov processes in view of operator theory.<ref name="MinimalQDS-AC-FF">{{cite journal |last1=Chebotarev |first1=A.M |last2=Fagnola |first2=F |title=Sufficient Conditions for Conservativity of Minimal Quantum Dynamical Semigroups |journal=Journal of Functional Analysis |date=March 1998 |volume=153 |issue=2 |pages=382–404 |doi=10.1006/jfan.1997.3189|arxiv=funct-an/9711006 |s2cid=18823390 }}</ref> | ||
===Infinitesimal generator of QDS=== | ===Infinitesimal generator of QDS=== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 50: | ||
==Characterization of generators of uniformly continuous QMSs== | ==Characterization of generators of uniformly continuous QMSs== | ||
''Related topic:'' Lindbladian | |||
If the quantum Markov semigroup <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is uniformly continuous in addition, which means <math> \lim_{t \rightarrow 0^+} \left\| \mathcal{T}_t - \mathcal{T}_0 \right\| = 0 </math>, then | If the quantum Markov semigroup <math> \mathcal{T} </math> is uniformly continuous in addition, which means <math> \lim_{t \rightarrow 0^+} \left\| \mathcal{T}_t - \mathcal{T}_0 \right\| = 0 </math>, then | ||
* the infinitesimal generator <math> \mathcal{L} </math> will be a | * the infinitesimal generator <math> \mathcal{L} </math> will be a bounded operator on von Neumann algebra <math> \mathcal{A} </math> with domain <math> \mathrm{Dom} (\mathcal{L}) = \mathcal{A} </math>,<ref name="FA-Rudin">{{cite book |last1=Rudin |first1=Walter |title=Functional analysis |date=1991 |publisher=McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math |location=New York |isbn=978-0070542365 |edition=Second}}</ref> | ||
* the map <math> t \mapsto \mathcal{T}_t a </math> will automatically be continuous for every <math> a \in \mathcal{A} </math>,<ref name="FA-Rudin" /> | * the map <math> t \mapsto \mathcal{T}_t a </math> will automatically be continuous for every <math> a \in \mathcal{A} </math>,<ref name="FA-Rudin" /> | ||
* the infinitesimal generator <math> \mathcal{L} </math> will be also <math> \sigma </math>-weakly continuous.<ref name="Diximier-sigma-weak-continuity">{{cite journal |last1=Dixmier |first1=Jacques |title=Les algèbres d'opérateurs dans l'espace hilbertien |journal=Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet) |date=1957}}</ref> | * the infinitesimal generator <math> \mathcal{L} </math> will be also <math> \sigma </math>-weakly continuous.<ref name="Diximier-sigma-weak-continuity">{{cite journal |last1=Dixmier |first1=Jacques |title=Les algèbres d'opérateurs dans l'espace hilbertien |journal=Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet) |date=1957}}</ref> | ||
| Line 60: | Line 59: | ||
Under such assumption, the infinitesimal generator <math> \mathcal{L} </math> has the characterization<ref name="Lindbladian">{{cite journal |last1=Lindblad |first1=Goran |title=On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups |journal=Communications in Mathematical Physics |date=1976 |volume=48 |issue=2 |pages=119–130 |doi=10.1007/BF01608499|s2cid=55220796 |url=http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103899849 }}</ref> | Under such assumption, the infinitesimal generator <math> \mathcal{L} </math> has the characterization<ref name="Lindbladian">{{cite journal |last1=Lindblad |first1=Goran |title=On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups |journal=Communications in Mathematical Physics |date=1976 |volume=48 |issue=2 |pages=119–130 |doi=10.1007/BF01608499|s2cid=55220796 |url=http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103899849 }}</ref> | ||
:<math> \mathcal{L} \left( a \right) = i \left[ H, a \right] + \sum_{j} \left( V_j^\dagger a V_j - \frac{1}{2} \left\{ V_j^\dagger V_j, a \right\} \right) </math> | :<math> \mathcal{L} \left( a \right) = i \left[ H, a \right] + \sum_{j} \left( V_j^\dagger a V_j - \frac{1}{2} \left\{ V_j^\dagger V_j, a \right\} \right) </math> | ||
where <math> a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, <math> V_j \in \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H}) </math>, <math> \sum_{j} V_j^\dagger V_j \in \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H}) </math>, and <math> H \in \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H}) </math> is | where <math> a \in \mathcal{A} </math>, <math> V_j \in \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H}) </math>, <math> \sum_{j} V_j^\dagger V_j \in \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H}) </math>, and <math> H \in \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H}) </math> is self-adjoint. Moreover, above <math> \left[ \cdot, \cdot \right] </math> denotes the commutator, and <math> \left\{ \cdot, \cdot \right\} </math> the anti-commutator. | ||
==Selected recent publications== | ==Selected recent publications== | ||
| Line 71: | Line 70: | ||
* {{cite journal |last1=Carlen |first1=Eric A. |last2=Maas |first2=Jan |title=Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum Markov semigroups with detailed balance |journal=Journal of Functional Analysis |date=September 2017 |volume=273 |issue=5 |pages=1810–1869 |doi=10.1016/j.jfa.2017.05.003|arxiv=1609.01254 |s2cid=119734534 }} | * {{cite journal |last1=Carlen |first1=Eric A. |last2=Maas |first2=Jan |title=Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum Markov semigroups with detailed balance |journal=Journal of Functional Analysis |date=September 2017 |volume=273 |issue=5 |pages=1810–1869 |doi=10.1016/j.jfa.2017.05.003|arxiv=1609.01254 |s2cid=119734534 }} | ||
==See also== | == See also == | ||
{{#invoke:PhysicsQC|tocHeadingAndList|Physics:Quantum basics/See also}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 88: | Line 79: | ||
[[Category:Semigroup theory]] | [[Category:Semigroup theory]] | ||
{{Sourceattribution|Quantum Markov semigroup}} | {{Author|Harold Foppele}} | ||
{{Sourceattribution|Physics:Quantum Markov semigroup|1}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 23 May 2026
Markov semigroup in quantum mechanics, a quantum Markov semigroup describes the dynamics in a Markovian open quantum system. The axiomatic definition of the prototype of quantum Markov semigroups was first introduced by A. Kossakowski in 1972, and then developed by V. In quantum mechanics, a quantum Markov semigroup describes the dynamics in a Markovian open quantum system. The axiomatic definition of the prototype of quantum Markov semigroups was first introduced by A. Kossakowski in 1972, and then developed by V. An ideal quantum system is not realistic because it should be completely isolated while, in practice, it is influenced by the coupling to an environment, which typically has a large number of degrees of freedom (for example an atom interacting with the surrounding radiation field).
Motivation
An ideal quantum system is not realistic because it should be completely isolated while, in practice, it is influenced by the coupling to an environment, which typically has a large number of degrees of freedom (for example an atom interacting with the surrounding radiation field). A complete microscopic description of the degrees of freedom of the environment is typically too complicated. Hence, one looks for simpler descriptions of the dynamics of the open system. In principle, one should investigate the unitary dynamics of the total system, i.e. the system and the environment, to obtain information about the reduced system of interest by averaging the appropriate observables over the degrees of freedom of the environment. To model the dissipative effects due to the interaction with the environment, the Schrödinger equation is replaced by a suitable master equation, such as a Lindblad equation or a stochastic Schrödinger equation in which the infinite degrees of freedom of the environment are "synthesized" as a few quantum noises. Mathematically, time evolution in a Markovian open quantum system is no longer described by means of one-parameter groups of unitary maps, but one needs to introduce quantum Markov semigroups.
Definitions
Quantum dynamical semigroup (QDS)
In general, quantum dynamical semigroups can be defined on von Neumann algebras, so the dimensionality of the system could be infinite. Let be a von Neumann algebra acting on Hilbert space , a quantum dynamical semigroup on is a collection of bounded operators on , denoted by , with the following properties:[1]
- , ,
- , , ,
- is completely positive for all ,
- is a -weakly continuous operator in for all ,
- For all , the map is continuous with respect to the -weak topology on .
It is worth mentioning that, under the condition of complete positivity, the operators are -weakly continuous if and only if are normal.[1] Recall that, letting denote the convex cone of positive elements in , a positive operator is said to be normal if for every increasing net in with least upper bound in one has
for each in a norm-dense linear sub-manifold of .
Quantum Markov semigroup (QMS)
A quantum dynamical semigroup is said to be identity-preserving (or conservative, or Markovian) if
-
()
where is the identity element. For simplicity, is called quantum Markov semigroup. Notice that, the identity-preserving property and positivity of imply for all and then is a contraction semigroup.[2]
The Condition (1) plays an important role not only in the proof of uniqueness and unitarity of solution of a Hudson–Parthasarathy quantum stochastic differential equation, but also in deducing regularity conditions for paths of classical Markov processes in view of operator theory.[3]
Infinitesimal generator of QDS
The infinitesimal generator of a quantum dynamical semigroup is the operator with domain , where
and .
Characterization of generators of uniformly continuous QMSs
Related topic: Lindbladian
If the quantum Markov semigroup is uniformly continuous in addition, which means , then
- the infinitesimal generator will be a bounded operator on von Neumann algebra with domain ,[4]
- the map will automatically be continuous for every ,[4]
- the infinitesimal generator will be also -weakly continuous.[5]
Under such assumption, the infinitesimal generator has the characterization[6]
where , , , and is self-adjoint. Moreover, above denotes the commutator, and the anti-commutator.
Selected recent publications
- Chebotarev, A.M; Fagnola, F (March 1998). "Sufficient Conditions for Conservativity of Minimal Quantum Dynamical Semigroups". Journal of Functional Analysis 153 (2): 382–404. doi:10.1006/jfan.1997.3189.
- Fagnola, Franco; Rebolledo, Rolando (2003-06-01). "Transience and recurrence of quantum Markov semigroups". Probability Theory and Related Fields 126 (2): 289–306. doi:10.1007/s00440-003-0268-0.
- Rebolledo, R (May 2005). "Decoherence of quantum Markov semigroups". Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré B 41 (3): 349–373. doi:10.1016/j.anihpb.2004.12.003. http://www.numdam.org/item/AIHPB_2005__41_3_349_0/.
- Umanità, Veronica (April 2006). "Classification and decomposition of Quantum Markov Semigroups". Probability Theory and Related Fields 134 (4): 603–623. doi:10.1007/s00440-005-0450-7.
- Fagnola, Franco; Umanità, Veronica (2007-09-01). "Generators of detailed balance quantum markov semigroups". Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 10 (3): 335–363. doi:10.1142/S0219025707002762.
- Carlen, Eric A.; Maas, Jan (September 2017). "Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum Markov semigroups with detailed balance". Journal of Functional Analysis 273 (5): 1810–1869. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2017.05.003.
See also
Table of contents (217 articles)
Index
Full contents
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Fagnola, Franco (1999). "Quantum Markov semigroups and quantum flows". Proyecciones 18 (3): 1–144. doi:10.22199/S07160917.1999.0003.00002. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247317142.
- ↑ Bratteli, Ola; Robinson, Derek William (1987). Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-17093-6.
- ↑ Chebotarev, A.M; Fagnola, F (March 1998). "Sufficient Conditions for Conservativity of Minimal Quantum Dynamical Semigroups". Journal of Functional Analysis 153 (2): 382–404. doi:10.1006/jfan.1997.3189.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Rudin, Walter (1991). Functional analysis (Second ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. ISBN 978-0070542365.
- ↑ Dixmier, Jacques (1957). "Les algèbres d'opérateurs dans l'espace hilbertien". Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet).
- ↑ Lindblad, Goran (1976). "On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups". Communications in Mathematical Physics 48 (2): 119–130. doi:10.1007/BF01608499. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103899849.
Source attribution: Physics:Quantum Markov semigroup

