Physics:Quantum Weak measurement: Difference between revisions

From HandWiki Test
imported>WikiHarold
Replace raw Quantum Collection backlink with B backlink template
Normalize quantum page header order
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Quantum Collection topic on Quantum Weak measurement}}
{{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}}
{{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum POVM|previous label=POVM|next=Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse|next label=Measurement collapse}}
<div style="display:flex; gap:24px; align-items:flex-start; max-width:1200px;">


{{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}}
<div style="width:280px;">
__TOC__
</div>


In [[quantum mechanics]], a '''weak measurement''' is a type of [[quantum measurement]] that extracts only a small amount of information from a system while causing minimal disturbance to its state.<ref name=Brun2002>{{cite journal
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;">
| author = Todd A. Brun
'''Weak measurement''' in quantum mechanics, a weak measurement is a type of quantum measurement that extracts only a small amount of information from a system while causing minimal disturbance to its state. Weak measurements arise naturally within the general framework of positive operator-valued measurements (POVMs), where the measurement strength can be continuously varied. In contrast to projective measurements, weak measurements only partially collapse the quantum state. A fundamental principle of quantum mechanics is that measurement disturbs the system being observed. According to results such as Busch’s theorem, there is no information gain without disturbance. Weak measurements operate in the regime where this disturbance is small. A standard description of weak measurement involves coupling the system weakly to an auxiliary system (ancilla).
| title = A simple model of quantum trajectories
</div>
| journal = Am. J. Phys.
| volume = 70
| issue = 7
| pages = 719–737
| year = 2002
| doi = 10.1119/1.1475328
}}</ref>


Weak measurements arise naturally within the general framework of [[POVM|positive operator-valued measurements]] (POVMs), where the measurement strength can be continuously varied. In contrast to [[projective measurement]]s, weak measurements only partially collapse the quantum state.
<div style="width:300px;">
[[File:Weak_measurement_diagram_yellow_bg.png|thumb|280px|Quantum Weak measurement.]]
</div>


[[File:Weak_measurement_diagram_yellow_bg.png|thumb|400px|right|Weak measurement gently probes a quantum state, extracting limited information while only slightly disturbing the system.]]
</div>


== Concept ==
== Concept ==
Line 43: Line 44:
where <math>\lambda</math> is small. Because the evolution is close to the identity, the system is only weakly perturbed.
where <math>\lambda</math> is small. Because the evolution is close to the identity, the system is only weakly perturbed.


After measuring the ancilla, the system undergoes a transformation described by [[Kraus operator]]s <math>M_q</math>, with corresponding POVM elements
After measuring the ancilla, the system undergoes a transformation described by Kraus operatorss <math>M_q</math>, with corresponding POVM elements


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 93: Line 94:
Weak measurements are widely used in:
Weak measurements are widely used in:


* [[Quantum control]] and feedback systems   
* Quantum control and feedback systems   
* Continuous quantum measurement and quantum trajectories   
* Continuous quantum measurement and quantum trajectories   
* [[Quantum information]] processing   
* Quantum information processing   
* Precision measurement and amplification techniques   
* Precision measurement and amplification techniques   
* Adaptive measurement strategies (e.g. the Dolinar receiver)<ref name=Dolinar>{{cite journal
* Adaptive measurement strategies (e.g. the Dolinar receiver)<ref name=Dolinar>{{cite journal
Line 104: Line 105:
  }}</ref>
  }}</ref>


They are also closely related to the concept of the [[weak value]], introduced by Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman.<ref name=Aharonov1988>{{cite journal
They are also closely related to the concept of the weak value, introduced by Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman.<ref name=Aharonov1988>{{cite journal
  | author1=Yakir Aharonov
  | author1=Yakir Aharonov
  | author2=David Z. Albert
  | author2=David Z. Albert

Latest revision as of 11:32, 22 May 2026

← Previous : POVM
Next : Measurement collapse →

Weak measurement in quantum mechanics, a weak measurement is a type of quantum measurement that extracts only a small amount of information from a system while causing minimal disturbance to its state. Weak measurements arise naturally within the general framework of positive operator-valued measurements (POVMs), where the measurement strength can be continuously varied. In contrast to projective measurements, weak measurements only partially collapse the quantum state. A fundamental principle of quantum mechanics is that measurement disturbs the system being observed. According to results such as Busch’s theorem, there is no information gain without disturbance. Weak measurements operate in the regime where this disturbance is small. A standard description of weak measurement involves coupling the system weakly to an auxiliary system (ancilla).

Quantum Weak measurement.

Concept

A fundamental principle of quantum mechanics is that measurement disturbs the system being observed. According to results such as Busch’s theorem, there is no information gain without disturbance.[1]

Weak measurements operate in the regime where this disturbance is small. As a result:

  • The measurement outcome carries limited information.
  • The post-measurement state remains close to the original state.
  • Repeated weak measurements can build up information gradually.

Weak interaction model

A standard description of weak measurement involves coupling the system weakly to an auxiliary system (ancilla).

Let a system in state |ψ interact with an ancilla in state |ϕ. The joint state evolves under a weak interaction Hamiltonian

H=AB,

with unitary evolution

UIiλAB12λ2A2B2,

where λ is small. Because the evolution is close to the identity, the system is only weakly perturbed.

After measuring the ancilla, the system undergoes a transformation described by Kraus operatorss Mq, with corresponding POVM elements

Eq=MqMq,qEq=I.

The post-measurement state conditioned on outcome q is

|ψq=Mq|ψψ|MqMq|ψ.

This formalism shows that weak measurements are naturally embedded in the POVM framework.

Measurement strength

The strength of a measurement determines the tradeoff between information gained and disturbance caused:

  • **Strong measurement** → maximal information, large disturbance
  • **Weak measurement** → minimal disturbance, little information

In many models, a parameter (such as a Gaussian width σ) controls this strength. In the limit:

  • σ0 → projective (strong) measurement
  • σ → very weak measurement

Information–disturbance tradeoff

Weak measurement illustrates the fundamental tradeoff between information gain and disturbance. This relationship has been studied extensively in quantum information theory.[2]

A key result is the gentle measurement lemma, which states that if a measurement is unlikely to change the outcome, it only slightly disturbs the state.[3]

Applications

Weak measurements are widely used in:

  • Quantum control and feedback systems
  • Continuous quantum measurement and quantum trajectories
  • Quantum information processing
  • Precision measurement and amplification techniques
  • Adaptive measurement strategies (e.g. the Dolinar receiver)[4]

They are also closely related to the concept of the weak value, introduced by Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman.[5]

See also

Table of contents (217 articles)

Index

Full contents

References

  1. Paul Busch (2009). No Information Without Disturbance: Quantum Limitations of Measurement. Springer. 
  2. C. A. Fuchs; A. Peres (1996). "Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain". Phys. Rev. A 53: 2038–2045. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2038. 
  3. A. Winter (1999). "Coding theorem and strong converse for quantum channels". IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45: 2481–2485. doi:10.1109/18.796385. 
  4. S. J. Dolinar (1973). "An optimum receiver for the binary coherent state quantum channel". MIT Research Laboratory Report. 
  5. Yakir Aharonov; David Z. Albert; Lev Vaidman (1988). "How the result of a measurement can be anomalous". Phys. Rev. Lett. 60: 1351–1354. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351. 


Author: Harold Foppele


Source attribution: Physics:Quantum Weak measurement