Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse: Difference between revisions

From HandWiki Test
← Older editNewer edit →
Maintenance script (talk | contribs)
5,209 edits
Clean Book I red links, intro, and image slots
Clean missing Book I links and template output
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Quantum Collection topic on Quantum Measurement collapse}}
{{Short description|Quantum Collection topic on Quantum Measurement collapse}}


{{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}}
{{Quantum book backlink|Measurement and information}}
Line 27: Line 27:
</math>
</math>


Here the coefficients <math>c_i</math> are [[probability amplitude]]s, given by
Here the coefficients <math>c_i</math> are probability amplitudes, given by


<math display="block">
<math display="block">
Line 57: Line 57:
Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.<ref name="Hall">{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Brian C. |title=Quantum Theory for Mathematicians |publisher=Springer |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4614-7115-8 |page=68}}</ref> For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities.
Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.<ref name="Hall">{{Cite book |last=Hall |first=Brian C. |title=Quantum Theory for Mathematicians |publisher=Springer |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4614-7115-8 |page=68}}</ref> For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities.


Examples include the [[double-slit experiment]], where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.<ref name="Bach2013">{{cite journal | last1=Bach | first1=Roger | last2=Pope | first2=Damian | last3=Liou | first3=Sy-Hwang | last4=Batelaan | first4=Herman | title=Controlled double-slit electron diffraction | journal=New Journal of Physics | volume=15 | issue=3 | year=2013 | article-number=033018 | doi=10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018 }}</ref>
Examples include the double-slit experiment, where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.<ref name="Bach2013">{{cite journal | last1=Bach | first1=Roger | last2=Pope | first2=Damian | last3=Liou | first3=Sy-Hwang | last4=Batelaan | first4=Herman | title=Controlled double-slit electron diffraction | journal=New Journal of Physics | volume=15 | issue=3 | year=2013 | article-number=033018 | doi=10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018 }}</ref>


== The measurement problem ==
== The measurement problem ==


The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the [[measurement problem]] of quantum mechanics.<ref name="Zurek2003">{{Cite journal |last=Zurek |first=Wojciech Hubert |title=Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=715–775 |year=2003 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715}}</ref>
The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.<ref name="Zurek2003">{{Cite journal |last=Zurek |first=Wojciech Hubert |title=Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=715–775 |year=2003 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715}}</ref>


To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.<ref name="Susskind">{{Cite book |last1=Susskind |first1=Leonard |last2=Friedman |first2=Art |title=Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum |publisher=Basic Books |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-465-06290-4}}</ref>
To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.<ref name="Susskind">{{Cite book |last1=Susskind |first1=Leonard |last2=Friedman |first2=Art |title=Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum |publisher=Basic Books |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-465-06290-4}}</ref>
Line 70: Line 70:


* In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory.
* In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory.
* In the [[many-worlds interpretation]], collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
* In the many-worlds interpretation, collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
* In [[objective-collapse theory]], collapse is treated as a real physical process.
* In objective-collapse theory, collapse is treated as a real physical process.
* In approaches based on [[quantum decoherence]], interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.<ref name="Schlosshauer">{{cite journal |last=Schlosshauer |first=Maximilian |title=Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=1267–1305 |year=2005 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267}}</ref>
* In approaches based on quantum decoherence, interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.<ref name="Schlosshauer">{{cite journal |last=Schlosshauer |first=Maximilian |title=Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=1267–1305 |year=2005 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267}}</ref>


== History ==
== History ==

Revision as of 08:47, 20 May 2026



← Back to Measurement and information Book I

Measurement collapse is a Book I topic in the Quantum Collection. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome. Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse, also called reduction of the state vector, is the process by which a wave function—initially in a quantum superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate when a measurement yields a definite outcome..  Collapse is one of the two ways quantum systems are commonly described as evolving in time; the other is the continuous deterministic evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation.

Quantum Measurement collapse.

Mathematical description

A quantum state may be expanded in a basis of eigenstates {|ϕi⟩} of an observable:

|ψ⟩=∑ici|ϕi⟩.

Here the coefficients ci are probability amplitudes, given by

ci=⟨ϕi|ψ⟩.

When the observable is measured, the state is postulated to collapse to one of the eigenstates:

|ψ⟩=∑ici|ϕi⟩↦|ϕi⟩.

The probability that the outcome corresponding to |ϕi⟩ is obtained is

P(i)=|ci|2,

with normalization

∑i|ci|2=1.

This collapse postulate is introduced to account for the fact that an immediately repeated measurement gives the same result.[1]

Physical meaning

Wave function collapse connects the probabilistic quantum description with definite measurement outcomes such as position, momentum, or spin.[2] For an individual event, only one outcome is observed, even though the pre-measurement state may be a superposition of many possibilities.

Examples include the double-slit experiment, where each particle is detected at a definite location although many events build up an interference pattern, and the Stern–Gerlach experiment, where each atom is observed in one of the discrete spin channels.[3]

The measurement problem

The Schrödinger equation predicts a continuous evolution containing all possible outcomes in superposition, but an actual measurement yields only one definite result. This tension is known as the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.[4]

To make predictions, orthodox quantum mechanics combines unitary evolution with the Born rule and the collapse postulate. Although this framework is extremely successful experimentally, the physical status of collapse remains debated.[5]

Interpretations

Different interpretations of quantum mechanics treat collapse in different ways.

  • In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse is taken as a fundamental part of measurement theory.
  • In the many-worlds interpretation, collapse does not occur; instead, all outcomes persist in different branches.
  • In objective-collapse theory, collapse is treated as a real physical process.
  • In approaches based on quantum decoherence, interaction with the environment explains why classical alternatives appear, though decoherence by itself does not select a single outcome.[6]

History

The idea of wave function reduction appeared early in the development of quantum mechanics. Werner Heisenberg used it in 1927 in discussing quantum measurement, and John von Neumann gave it a systematic mathematical formulation in 1932.[7]

See also

Table of contents (217 articles)

Index

Full contents

References

  1. ↑ Griffiths, David J.; Schroeter, Darrell F. (2018). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (3 ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-18963-8. 
  2. ↑ Hall, Brian C. (2013). Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Springer. p. 68. ISBN 978-1-4614-7115-8. 
  3. ↑ Bach, Roger; Pope, Damian; Liou, Sy-Hwang; Batelaan, Herman (2013). "Controlled double-slit electron diffraction". New Journal of Physics 15 (3). doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018. 
  4. ↑ Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (2003). "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical". Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (3): 715–775. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715. 
  5. ↑ Susskind, Leonard; Friedman, Art (2014). Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-06290-4. 
  6. ↑ Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2005). "Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics". Reviews of Modern Physics 76 (4): 1267–1305. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267. 
  7. ↑ Kiefer, Claus (2003). "On the Interpretation of Quantum Theory — from Copenhagen to the Present Day". Time, Quantum and Information. Springer. pp. 291–299. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10557-3_19. 


Author: Harold Foppele


Source attribution: Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.scholarlywiki.org/index.php?title=Physics:Quantum_Measurement_collapse&oldid=5595"